• Phone: 786-871-7957
  • Fax: 305-445-5930
  • Email Us

Kaplan & Miller, P.A.

999 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 555 Coral Gables FL 33134 U.S.A. View Map

Workers Compensation

Injured Employee's Recovery Election
Historically, when an employee was injured in the course of his employment, but at the hands of a negligent third party, he was technically able to pursue relief through both the workers' compensation system and a third-party action. Though not able to receive a double recovery, the employee was technically eligible to recover under either theory. However, strict election rules required that he choose which theory of recovery he would pursue, even if his "choice" ultimately left him with no compensation at all. For example, the injured employee elects to proceed with a third-party action, thereby foregoing workers' compensation, but ends up losing the third-party action. More...
Disability Under the "Odd-Lot" Doctrine
The "odd-lot" doctrine is an avenue by which a worker may be found to be totally disabled based on unemployability rather than just the degree to which he is injured. It provides that, although a worker is not completely unable to work, his condition is such that he will not be regularly employed in any reasonably stable area of the labor market. The hallmark of placement in the "odd-lot" category is a job prospect that is irregular and unpredictable. More...
Acts Outside Employee's Regular Duties That Benefit Others
When an employee acts to benefit his employer, he is considered to be within the course of his employment as long as such actions were undertaken in good faith. It is immaterial whether the employee's own regular work assignments were furthered by his actions; it is merely whether the employer's interests were promoted. As a corollary to this rule, it is also the case that if an employee aids a co-worker with the co-worker's job duties, his good faith actions in doing so are also within the course of his employment. Compensation has even been awarded to an employee who was injured while helping a co-worker after the employee's regular workday had ended. The reasoning behind the allowance of compensation in instances such as this is that it is contrary to the employer's best interests to inhibit the helpful nature of employees. Thus, helping a fellow employee is advancing the employer's interests, albeit indirectly. More...
Social Security Disability Appeals Process
If an individual disagrees with the decision of the Social Security Administration, an appeal can be taken. In the appeals process, all parts of the decision will be re-examined, including those parts that are favorable to the appellant. A written request for an appeal is required and it must be done within a specified time period. The individual may have a representative aid them in the appeals process. The representative will act on behalf of the individual, but is prohibited from collecting a fee for this service without first gaining permission from the Social Security Administration. More...
Notice of Injury
Generally, workers' compensation statutes contain a limitations period in which the injured employee must give notice of his injury. Under most circumstances, the notice is provided to the employer. The notice period itself is relatively small. Some statutes mandate that it be given as soon as possible while others provide for a fixed timeframe such as, for example, within a designated number of weeks or months following the injury. The required notice allows the employer to immediately provide the employee with medical care and allows for a more accurate and comprehensive investigation into the accident causing the employee's injury. If the employee does not give the mandated notice, his claim for benefits will be denied. More...

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Kaplan & Miller website is powered by LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell®. || Sitemap